|
 |
 |
ENGAGING STUDENTS
| 5=Excellent | 4=Above Average | 3=Good | 2=Poor | 1=Cannot Judge | Responses | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. How well did presenters address the issues listed in the "issue description?" | 9% | 55% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 11 | 14% |
| 2. How well did the workshop achieve the objectives? | 0% | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 11 | 14% |
| 3. How well did the workshop incorporate adult learning techniques and interactive approaches allowing discussion between and among audience members and speakers? | 18% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 11 | 14% |
| 4. Rate the effectiveness of the workshop in general. | 13% | 63% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 8 | 11% |
| 5. Effectiveness of speaker: Sam Whitridge | 11% | 44% | 44% | 0% | 0% | 9 | 12% |
| 6. Effectiveness of speaker: Frances Oyung | 22% | 33% | 44% | 0% | 0% | 9 | 12% |
| 7. Effectiveness of speaker: Debbie Spresser | 13% | 50% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 8 | 11% |
| 8. Effectiveness of speaker: Kolleen Yake | 33% | 44% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 9 | 12% |
Report a Problem | (C) Kwik Surveys 2008/2009