JUMPING OVER PROJECT PITFALLS
| 5=Excellent | 4=Above Average | 3=Good | 2=Poor | 1=Cannot Judge | Responses | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. How well did presenters address the issues listed in the "issue description?" | 47% | 47% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 15 | 14% |
| 2. How well did the workshop achieve the objectives? | 47% | 40% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 15 | 14% |
| 3. How well did the workshop incorporate adult learning techniques and interactive approaches allowing discussion between and among audience members and speakers? | 20% | 33% | 40% | 7% | 0% | 15 | 14% |
| 4. Rate the effectiveness of the workshop in general. | 40% | 47% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 15 | 14% |
| 5. Effectiveness of speaker: Lori Lilly | 60% | 13% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 15 | 14% |
| 6. Effectiveness of speaker: Daniel Newberry | 47% | 47% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 15 | 14% |
| 7. Effectiveness of speaker: Cheryl McGinnis | 33% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 15 | 14% |
Report a Problem | (C) Kwik Surveys 2008 - 2010 | Contact support